Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 A.D.2d 819

In re Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1964-03-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2001

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-03-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Application by petitioner, in his individual capacity, to discipline respondent, an attorney, on certain stated charges growing out of a civil action. Application dismissed. The petitioner is not the proper party to bring a disciplinary proceeding against an attorney (Matter of Tuck, 180 App. Div. 924; Matter of Anonymous No. 1, 13 N Y 2d 654). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

/20/ad2d/819 · .json · Public domain