¶1 There was sufficient evidence to make out a ease for the state, and therefore the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused. Charge 11 refused to defendant has misleading tendencies, and its refusal was not error. The rulings of the court upon the admissibility of testimony were free from error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
20 Ala. App. 673
103 So 922
Brooks v. State
Decided April 7, 1925
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1925-04-07
Decided 1925-04-07