Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Ala. App. 75

101 So 71

Boswell v. Linder

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1924

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1924-06-17

Relies on Frierson v. Haley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-06-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1952

3 state decisions

101924193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICI-CEN, P. J.

¶1 In this cause appellee ■appears specially for the sole purpose of making a motion to dismiss this appeal, on the ground of a noneompliance with the statute, which requires that a citation of appeal must not only issue, but must he served upon appellee or his attorney at least 10 days before the day to which the appeal is return-able.

¶2 Section 2881 of the Code of 1907 provides:

¶3 “Upon an appeal being taken, the clerk of the circuit court, * . must issue a citation to the adverse party, returnable to tbe day to which the appeal is returnable, notifying -him of the appeal, which must be served on him, or his attorney, at least ten. days (unless otherwise provided)" before the day to which the appeal is returnable.”

¶4 An examination of the record fails to show any service upon the appellee or his attorneys. Moreover, there has been filed in this court’ an affidavit of the appellee, and each of his attorneys in this cause, to the effect that no citation of appeal, nor any notice of appeal, nor brief óf appellant in this cause,, has been served on either of them. For failure to serve appellee or his attorneys with a. citation of appeal, as the statute requires, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. Frierson v. Haley, 1 Ala. App. 576,’ 55 So-uth. 429.

¶5 Appeal dismissed.

/20/alaapp/75 · .json · Public domain