20 Ariz. App. 196 - Riggins v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited
2 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Dandridge v. Williams · 326 F. Supp. 920 - Provost v. Betit · 337 F. Supp. 350 - Rochester v. Ingram · State Ex Rel. Ellis v. Heim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A. At least twenty days prior to adoption of any rule, notice of the proposed action shall be filed with the secretary of state. The notice shall include: 1. A statement of the time, place and nature of the proceedings for adoption of the rule. 2. Reference to the authority under which the rule is proposed to be adopted. 3. Either an informative summary of the proposed rule, or the express terms thereof. 4. Such other matters as are prescribed by statute applicable to the specific state agency or to any specific rule, or class of rules. B. On the date and at the time designated in the notice, the agency shall afford any interested person, his duly authorized representatives, or both, the opportunity to present statements, arguments or contentions in writing relating thereto, with or without opportunity to present them orally.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If in a particular instance the state agency makes a finding that adoption of a rule is necessary for immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety and that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to public interest, the rule may be adopted as an emergency rule, without the notice provided by § 41-1002.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The very nature of a special action is a unique remedy designed for an unusual set of circumstances where the speedy determination of the issue is of prime consideration. To allow a wide range of discovery, attendant with the delays involved, would tend to defeat the very purpose of a special action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.