20 Ariz. App. 331 - State v. Caldwell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

40 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a] search of premises, however, may include all property necessarily a part of the premises and so inseparable as to constitute a portion thereof.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Sanchez · 507 So. 2d 558 - Korreckt v. State

2. “In the instant case the four boxes containing marijuana were discovered in an area approximately 100 yards from the house beyond a fence and a corral area under some trees. Of special significance is the fact that the boxes were first discovered by the neighbor boy. This indicates that the boxes were in an area where someone from the general public was apt to wander. Under these circumstances, it would be unreasonable for defendants to assume that contraband in such an area would not be noticed and reported by some member of the public and investigated by the police. See State v. Stanton, supra. [ 7 Or.App. 286 , 490 P.2d 1274 (1971)]. Thus, the protection of the Fourth Amendment, which normally would require a search warrant, does not come into play. [20 Ariz.App. at 335, 512 P.2d at 867 ].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. White