Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 ARIZAPP 565 - Jay v. Kreigh

Jay v. Kreigh’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Tucson v. Garrett · Rhodes v. Clark · Colquhoun v. City of Tucson · 47 Cal. App. 112 - Dibble v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp. · Bailey v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The effect of the city’s annexation of territory making part of the proposed town of Oro Valley within the six-mile limit was to deprive the Board of Supervisors of jurisdiction to declare Oro Valley an incorporated town. This action was taken before the court issued the writ of mandamus. The trial court could not order the Board to do what it no longer had authority to do. Mandamus will not issue to enforce an abstract right which by reason of occurrence of an event subsequent to commencement of proceedings makes issuance of the writ of no practical value to petitioner. * * *” Jay v. Kreigh, supra, 514 P.2d at 738 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.