Spangler v. Kartzmark’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 1988
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McIsaac v. McMurray · Homuth v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. · St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Cauthen · Poti v. New England Road MacHinery Co. · Nelson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * in order to invalidate a release on account of mutual mistake, the mistake must relate to a past or present fact material to the contract and not to an opinion respecting future conditions as a result of present facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.