Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 B.T.A. 1027

Schroll v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 26, 1930

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1930-09-26

By authority of Russell v. United States,278 U.S. 181, it is held that where no proceeding was instituted for the collection of income tax prior to the expiration of limitation period, regardless of the fact that assessment was made prior to the expiration of such period, the collection of the tax is barred.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1933

Relies on Russell v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-09-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1028OPINION.

Love :

¶2If the issue here involved were one of first impression, we would be sadly perplexed in arriving at a conclusion. However, as the situation now exists, we believe the Supreme Court has settled the issue. The case of Russell v. United States, 278 U. S. 181, was *1029a case involving the identical issue here involved. It was originally tried in the District Court, where a judgment was rendered against the Government. The case was appealed by the Government to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, where the judgment of the lower court was reversed. The case then went to the Supreme Court, where the decision of the Circuit Court was reversed. We believe that the Russellcase controls the issue in the instant case, and therefore hold that limitation has barred the collection of the tax here in question.

¶3Judgment will be entered, for the petitioner.

/20/bta/1027 · .json · Public domain