Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 BTA 917 - Hal E. Roach Studios v. Commissioner

Hal E. Roach Studios v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1995

1 federal appellate ·

101930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickinson v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Though the evidence was not precise on the relative costs incurred for business and pleasure use, we are satisfied that at least one-half of the expense was an ordinary and necessary expense of petitioner’s business, and accordingly we allow the sum of $8,776.67 as a deduction [$17,543.35 having been disallowed by the Commissioner]. [Id. at 919.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.