Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 CAL 352 - Fitch v. Miller

Fitch v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1862

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
May 1939
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1939

16 state decisions

5018621870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. Allen · Sibley v. . Waffle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to render the sale effectual to confer a valid title, the probate court must have acquired jurisdiction of the case, by the presentation of a proper petition by the guardian.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.