Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Cal. 92

Plant v. Fleming

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1862

California Supreme Court · decided 1862-07-01

.Action brought on a promissory note to recover $3,100. Defendant answered, admitting an indebtedness of f 1,100, denying the balance, and making no counter claim. The case was by consent referred to a referee to take the testimony and report a finding of facts and a judgment.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1892

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court—Cope, J. and Norton, J. concurring.

¶1The only question presented for determination on the appeal is, whether a plaintiff can voluntarily submit to a nonsuit before a referee, after the proofs are closed, in a case where no counter claim is set up by the defendant. We have no doubt that under our statute the referee, upon a reference to try the issues and report a judgment, can exercise all the powers of a Judge in relation to the trial of the cause referred to him. For the purposes of the trial he takes the place of the Judge, and not only possesses the power, but upon the abandonment of the cause by the plaintiff'before its final submission, or upon the motion of the defendant when the plaintiff fails to prove a sufficient cause, it is his duty to grant a nonsuit, and to report his judgment to that effect. (Practice Act, secs. 148,182 and 188.)

¶2Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

/20/cal/92 · .json · Public domain