Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Cal. 3d 367 - Mailand v. Burckle

20 Cal. 3d 367 - Mailand v. Burckle’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably 26 Cal. 3d 397 - Younger v. Jensen (1980), County of Tuolumne (2001)

15 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

35019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Continental Inc v. Gte Sylvania Incorporated · Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. · United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. · Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]gree in any manner to keep the price of . . . [any] commodity . . . at a fixed or graduated figure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]ven though the members of the price-fixing group were in no position to control the market.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.