20 Cal. 3d 552 - Inniss v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently June 1990 · most notably 38 Cal. 3d 525 - Smith v. State Bar (1985), 28 Cal. 3d 465 - Giovanazzi v. State Bar (1980)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 786 - Himmel v. State Bar · Bradpiece v. State Bar · 3 Cal. 3d 381 - Demain v. State Bar · 15 Cal. 3d 973 - Doyle v. State Bar · 13 Cal. 3d 253 - Spindell v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he stipulated facts may not be contradicted; otherwise, the stipulation procedure would serve little or no purpose, requiring a remand for further evidentiary hearings whenever an attorney deems it advisable to challenge factual recitals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“On the other hand, fundamental fairness seems to require us to relieve an attorney from the legal conclusions to which he may have agreed solely because the recommended punishment seemed to him fair and reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.