Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Cal. 3d 717 - Martin v. State Bar

20 Cal. 3d 717 - Martin v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales (2007), 28 Cal. 3d 465 - Giovanazzi v. State Bar (1980)

3 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

5501978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 878 - Segretti v. State Bar · 4 Cal. 3d 786 - Himmel v. State Bar · Bradpiece v. State Bar · 6 Cal. 3d 909 - Bernstein v. State Bar · 13 Cal. 3d 253 - Spindell v. State Bar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Habitual neglect of client interests, constituting wilful or grossly negligent conduct, involves moral turpitude under Business and Professions Code section 6106.”). 2 . Judge Tallman claims in his dissent that Goldeshtein does not hold that establishing fraud requires that a defendant have made false representations in order to obtain something. Instead, he contends that Goldeshtein merely found such factors to be”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Serious misconduct exists if an attorney (1) wilfully fails to perform the legal services for which the attorney is retained and paid [citations]; [or] (2) wilfully fails to communicate with the client [citation]....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.