Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Cal. 4th 1 - People v. Rodriguez

20 Cal. 4th 1 - People v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

372
cited by 372 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 365 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 372 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 30 Cal. 4th 342 - People v. Maury (2003), 37 Cal. 4th 1067 - People v. Guerra (2006)

3 federal appellate · 365 state decisions

21201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 26 Cal. 3d 557 - People v. Johnson · 10 Cal. 4th 764 - People v. Stanley · People v. Alvarez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 372 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment below to determine whether it discloses substantial evidence - that is, evidence which is reasonable, credible, and of solid value - such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court's exercise of discretion in admitting or excluding evidence is reviewable for abuse [citation] and will not be disturbed except on a showing the trial court exercised its discretion in an arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice [citation].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Citation.] Instead, the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.