Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Cal. App. 255 - Georgeous v. Lewis

20 Cal. App. 255 - Georgeous v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1974

11 state decisions

301912192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brock v. Desmond & Co. · Mershon v. Williams · Blachford v. Frenzer · 16 Cal. App. 361 - Coalinga Pacific Oil & Gas Co. v. Associated Oil Co. · Dunn v. Barton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ It is the duty of a person contracting for a sublease to ascertain the provisions of the original lease; and a subtenant is charged with notice of the existence of the original lease, and is bound by its terms and conditions. (1 Wood’s Landlord and Tenant, sec. 93, p. 184; Jones on Landlord and Tenant, see. 455; Blachford v. Frenzer, 44 Neb. 829 [ 62 N. W. 1101 ]; Dunn v. Barton, 16 Fla. 765 .) “But even if this were not so, the clause contained in the sublease under consideration that it was ‘to hold only to the conditions of the original lease’ was actual notice to the plaintiff of the existence of the original lease; and knowing of its existence he was charged with knowledge of its covenants, conditions, and limitations which, by reference, were made a material part of the terms and conditions of the sublease. (Coalinga etc. Co. v. Associated Oil Co., 16 Cal. App. 361 [ 116 Pac 1107 ]; Brock v. Desmond & Co., 154 Ala. 634 [ 129 Am. St. Rep. 71 , 45 South. 665 ].) “The expressed covenants of the original and sublease are obviously opposed to the existence of an implied covenant which was to endure beyond the term granted to the defendants by the original lease.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.