20 Cal. App. 492 - Wilson v. Durkee’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1966
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Sullivan v. Griffith · Cavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Section 668 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California provides that the clerk must keep with the records of the court, a book to be called the ‘judgment book’, in which judgments must be entered, and section 664 of the same code provides that ‘in no case is the judgment effectual for any purpose until so entered’.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lemus v. Baur““The entry of a judgment consists in the recording of it in such book; hence, in a legal sense, there can be no record of a judgment until so entered.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lemus v. Baur
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.