Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 COLO 379 - Haley v. Elliott

Haley v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2013

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

701894190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morris & Thombs v. St. Louis National Bank · People v. San Francisco Sav. Union · Lawrence v. Fast · Elston v. Kennicott · Breeze v. Haley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “were purposely framed so that technical objections, without substantial merit, should not interfere with the collection of the public revenue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.