Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 COLO 532 - Jackson v. Burnham

Jackson v. Burnham’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
15
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 1991

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions — followed in 15 states

7018951900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cowley v. . People of the State of New York · Patten v. Wiggin · Guiterman v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. · Gottlieb v. Hartman · Ripont v. . Merchants' Life Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Some standard by which to determine the propriety of treatment must be adopted; otherwise experiments will take the place of skill, and the reckless experimentalists the place of the educated, experienced practitioner. . . . But when the case is one as to which a system of treatment has been followed for a long time, there should be no departure from it, unless the surgeon who does it is prepared to take the risk of establishing by his success the propriety and safety of his experiment. The rule protects the community against reckless experiments, while it admits the adoption of new remedies and modes of treatment only when their benefits have been demonstrated, or when, from the necessity of the case, the surgeon or physician must be left to the exercise of his own skill and experience.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.