Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Colo. App. 411

Ferrara v. Auric Mining Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1905

Colorado Court of Appeals · decided 1905-01-15

<p>1. Appellate Practice — Costs—Application to Sue as Poor Person.</p> <p>The ruling of the supreme court that section 676, Mills’ Ann. Stats., permitting courts in certain cases to allow parties to sue as poor persons is not applicable to that court, is equally applicable to the court of appeals.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>If section 676, Mills’ Ann. Stats., permitting courts in certain cases to allow parties to sue as poor persons were applicable to the court of appeals, it leaves the granting of an application to sue as such poor person to the discretion of the court..</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1905-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1996

3 state decisions

101905191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gunter, J.

¶1Defendant in error moved the court to require of plaintiff , in error a cost bond. Plaintiff in error confessed the motion, and filed a cross motion for leave to sue as a poor person. The cause has been submitted upon plaintiff in error’s motion.

¶2Such applications have been repeatedly ruled upon in our supreme court. While there are no reported decisions of the rulings the holding of that court has frequently and uniformly been that sec. 676,1 Mills’ Ann. Stats., permitting courts in certain cases to allow parties to sue as poor persons does not apply to that court. The ruling is equally applicable to this court. A thorough consideration of the question presented by this motion would involve a construction of the above section of our statutes, and, perhaps, the treaty between our country and the .Kingdom of Italy. It would further, perhaps, involve a decision of the question going to the vitals of this case. We do not desire to commit ourselves on such vital question at the threshold of the case and before we have had the full aid of counsel, which we will not have before the filing of the final briefs herein.

¶3Section 676, supra, if applicable to our court, leaves to our discretion the granting of applications to sue as a poor person. Either the exercise of this discretion, if the section be applicable to our court, or acting in obedience to the unreported practice of *413the supreme court as it now obtains, is a sufficient reason for denying tbe motion.

¶4Tbe motion to sue as a poor person is denied without intimating any opinion upon tbe vital question involved in tbe case. It is further ordered that a cost bond be filed as required by sec. 674, 1 Mills’ Ann. Stats., tbe sufficiency of tbe surety on tbe bond to be approved by the district clerk of Pueblo county, Colorado, such bond to be filed in this court within thirty days from this date.

/20/coloapp/411 · .json · Public domain