Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 CONN 544 - Pearce v. Olney

Pearce v. Olney’s Empirical Analysis

1850

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1993 · most notably United States v. Throckmorton (1878), Embry v. Palmer (1882)

2 district · 38 state decisions — followed in 19 states

100185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Indeed, this falls directly within and is but an illustration of the general rule that equity will interfere to restrain the use of an advantage gained in a court of ordinary jurisdiction, which must necessarily make that court an instrument of injustice in all cases where such advantage has been gained by the fraud, accident or mistake of the opposite party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled-that this jurisdiction will be exercised, whenever a party, having a good defence to an action at law, has had no opportunity to make it, or has been prevented by the fraud or improper management of the other party from making it, and by reason thereof a judgment has been obtained which it is against conscience to enforce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If this was all, the plaintiff would have no remedy, however unjust it might be to compel him to pay that judgment. Still, as he was duly served with process in that suit,' it was his duty to make defence in it; and an injunction ought not to be granted to relieve him from the consequences of his own neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.