¶1Points in dispute decided in preceding case of Thayer v. Hart.
¶2In Equity.
¶3Frederic H. Betts and O. Wyllys Betts, for complainants.
¶4Josiah P. Fitch, for defendant.
¶6This action involves the same patents examined in Thayer v. Hart, ante, 693. Infringement is admitted, and the question of prior invention alone is involved. The result reached in that action disposes of this also.
¶7There should be a decree for an injunction and an account, with costs.