Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 F.2d 164 - The Vinces

The Vinces’s Empirical Analysis

20 F.2d 164 · 1927

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1999
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1999

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

5019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ford v. United States · United States v. Stowell · United States v. Bowman · Cunard Co v. Mellon · Thomas Wood Junior v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any master of any vessel and any person in charge of any vehicle bound to the United States who does not produce' the manifest to the officer demanding the same shall be liable to a penalty of $500, and if any merchandise, including sea stores, is found on board of or after unlading from such vessel or vehicle which is not included or described in said manifest or does not agree therewith, the master of such vessel or the person in charge of such vehicle shall be liable to a penalty equal to the value of the merchandise so found or unladen, and any such merchandise belonging or consigned to the master or other officer or to any of the crew of such vessel, or to the owner or person in charge of’ such vehicle, shall be subject to forfeiture.” (Italics ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It shall be the duty of such officer to make seizure of the same, and to arrest, or, in case of escape or attempted escape, to pursue and arrest any person engaged in such breach or violation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.