Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 F.2d 275 - In re Hadden

In re Hadden’s Empirical Analysis

20 F.2d 275 · 1927

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 1967
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1967

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4019271930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fond Du Lac County v. May · Rowe v. Blodgett & Clapp Co. · Jacobs v. Baker · Mygatt v. Schaffer · International Mausoleum Co. v. Sievert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and refused the patent. The court in unanimously reversing, said: 22 It is difficult to perceive how a thing may be a manufacture, without producing an article of manufacture. The Commissioner, with commendable frankness, said:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.