Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 F.2d 607 - Reflectolyte Co. v. Luminous Unit Co.

Reflectolyte Co. v. Luminous Unit Co.’s Empirical Analysis

20 F.2d 607 · 1927

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
January 1958
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1958

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

501927193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 'The Ku-Klux Cases' Yarbrough · Mast Foos Company v. Stover Manufacturing Company · I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co. · Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co. · Shepard v. Carrigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A new combination, consisting of old elements functioning in the same way and producing the same result, with perhaps difference in degree only, as that of prior patented structures, held not to constitute ‘invention/ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.