Frink Co. v. Erikson’s Empirical Analysis
20 F.2d 707 · 1927
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2008
8 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Harvester Company of America v. Commonwealth of Kentucky · Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. · Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbin · People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co. · Goldey v. Morning News
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court has decided each case of this character upon the facts brought before it, and has laid down no all-embracing rule by which it may be determined what constitutes the doing of business by a foreign corporation in such manner as to subject it to a given jurisdiction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““We have tried, without success, to discover some salient circumstance or point common to all that might be held to be determinative of the instant case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.