Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 F.3d 1017 - National Labor Relations Board v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen, Helpers & Automotive Employees of Contra Costa County, Local No. 315

National Labor Relations Board v. General Truck Drivers, Warehousemen, Helpers & Automotive Employees of Contra Costa County, Local No. 315’s Empirical Analysis

20 F.3d 1017 · 1994

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
December 2011
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Retlaw Broadcasting Co Kjeo-Tv v. National Labor Relations Board (1995), California Pacific Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board (1996)

20 federal appellate ·

220199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board · Tobacco Institute, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Gardner v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and if the Board correctly applied the law,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The substantial evidence test is essentially a case-by-case analysis requiring review of the whole record.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.