United States v. Galbraith’s Empirical Analysis
20 F.3d 1054 · 1994
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · Hughey v. United States · Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he loss defendant subjectively intended to cause is not controlling if he was incapable of inflicting that loss.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, the test is whether the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, would allow a reasonable jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the evidence presented at trial, together with the jury instructions, raises the possibility that the defendant was convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.