United States v. Mohawk’s Empirical Analysis
20 F.3d 1480 · 1994
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Moreno (2006), Lopez v. Thompson (2000)
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Faretta v. California · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Rose v. Clark · Doggett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the bank was a federally insured institution, the district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the defendant understood his or her 'constitutional right to have [a] lawyer perform certain core functions,' and that he or she 'appreciate[d] the possible consequences of mishandling these core functions and the lawyer's superior ability to handle them.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.