United States v. Eldeeb’s Empirical Analysis
20 F.3d 841 · 1994
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Cannon (1996), United States v. Serrano-Lopez (2004)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 7 U.S.C. § 2024
Relies on Mathews v. United States · Yagow v. United States · Jacobson v. United States · Liteky v. United States · Jasperson v. Purolator Courier Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] party's failure to raise or discuss an issue in his brief is to be deemed an abandonment of that issue.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“entitled to an instruction on entrapment, ... if there was evidence that '(1) government agents implanted the criminal design in his mind, and (2) government agents induced him to commit the offense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 98-2468“shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Anderson v. Larson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.