Tonry v. Security Experts, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
20 F.3d 967 · 1994
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably United States v. Ameline (2005), Price v. United States Navy (1994)
20 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · Kliewer v. New Jersey · Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Shugrue · Schenberg v. Bond · 116 Cal. App. 3d 311 - Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing a judgment following a bench trial, we review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]arties may not unilaterally supplement the record on appeal with evidence not reviewed by the court below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.