Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 F. App'x 193

Southall v. Kupec

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Crawley v. Catoe

Decided 2001-10-11

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Michael R. Southall seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Southall v. Kupec, No. CA-00-1246-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 9, 2000; entered Aug. 10, 2000; Sept. 6, 2000); see also Crawley v. Catoe, 257 F.3d 395 (4th Cir.2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/20/fappx/193 · .json · Public domain