Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 F. App'x 197

Harvey v. Saunders

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Crawley v. Catoe

Decided 2001-10-11

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Ryland Lee Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harvey v. Saunders, No. CA-98-1387-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 10, 1999; entered Aug. 11, 1999); see also Crawley v. Catoe, 257 F.3d 395 (4th Cir.2001). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

*

¶3 This appeal was originally placed in abeyance for No. 00-6187, Atkinson v. Angelone.

/20/fappx/197 · .json · Public domain