Moore v. Kerenick

¶1 Samuel R. Moore appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant in his action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A §§ 621-634 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Kerenick, No. CA-97-1352-3-19BC (D.S.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED