20 F. Supp. 2d 901 - Soto v. McLean’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1803 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1821 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1822 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1841 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Shaw v. Stroud · Gant v. United States · Woodson v. Rowland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.