Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Ga. 94

Caldwell v. Ferrill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1856

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1856-06-15

Assumpsit, in Eandolph Superior Court. Decided by ■Judge Kiddoo, May Term,' 1856. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Lawrence T. Ferrill against John H. Caldwell, on a note bearing date the 18th day of June, 1841. Defendant plead the Statute of Limitations.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2024

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1856-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1By the Court.

McDonald, J.

¶2delivering the opinion.

¶3The note was barred by the Statute of Limitations, at the time the promise was made, which is relied on to prevent the operation of the statutory bar. The promise was made about the 1st of December, 1854. The Act of 1854, Eeb. 20th,. requires such promises to be in writing. That Statute applies to such promises or acknowledgements only as are made subsequent to its enactment.

¶4By some accident, this Act was not published with the *96Acts of the session to which it belongs, and is to be found in-the Pamphlet of the Laws of the Sessions 1855 and 1856. The judgment of the Court below is reversed, on the ground that the Court erred in deciding that the promise, which was verbal, was sufficient to take the case out of the Statute of Limitations. It is unnecessary to decide the other point made in the bill of exceptions.

/20/ga/94 · .json · Public domain