Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Ill. 173

Swift v. Green

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1858

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1858-04-15

<p>APPEAL FROM COOK.</p> <p>Where three are sued, and service of process is upon, two, and no appearance for all, judgment cannot go against all.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1880

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Walker, J.

¶1This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Green, Ware and Rice, against Richard K. Swift, Lyman P. Swift and James S. Johnston, in the Cook Circuit Court, to the special January term, 1858. The summons was returned served on Richard K. Swift and James S. Johnston, and, as to Lyman P. Swift, not found. On the 16th day of January, 1858, a judgment by default was rendered against all the defendants for the sum of two hundred and ninety-one dollars and seventy-five cents. There was no appearance entered by defendant Lyman P. Swift. And to reverse this judgment the defendants below prosecute this appeal, and assign for error that judgment was rendered against Lyman P. Swift when he had not been served with process and had not entered his appearance to the action.

¶2It is clearly erroneous to render judgment against all of several defendants when any one of them is not in court by service or otherwise. The service on a portion of the defendants does not give the court jurisdiction of those not served. O’Conner et al. v. Mullen, 11 Ill. R. 116 ; Davidson et al. v. Bond et al., 12 Ill. R. 84 ; Brockman et al. v. McDonald, 16 Ill. R. 112.

¶3The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

¶4Judgment reversed.

/20/ill/173 · .json · Public domain