Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Ill. 2d 500 - Cunningham v. Cunningham

20 Ill. 2d 500 - Cunningham v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1994

18 state decisions

1101960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kester v. Crilly · Clark v. Clark · Bremer v. Bremer · Sawyer v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When a confidential or fiduciary relationship does not exist as a matter of law, it must be proved by clear and convincing evidence in order to establish a basis for raising a constructive trust. Factors to be taken into consideration are degree of kinship, if any, disparity in age, health, mental condition, education and business experience between the parties, and the extent to which the allegedly servient party entrusted the handling of his business and financial affairs to the other and reposed faith and confidence in him. [Citation.]” (Cunningham v. Cunningham (1960), 20 Ill. 2d 500, 504 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.