Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Ill. App. 3d 970 - People v. Bissonnette

20 Ill. App. 3d 970 - People v. Bissonnette’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2013

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

7019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Ill. 2d 493 - People v. Lilly · 53 Ill. 2d 585 - People v. Harvey · 57 Ill. 2d 353 - People v. Scott · 51 Ill. 2d 79 - People v. Moore · 46 Ill. 2d 109 - The People v. Triplett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact he was called as an investigating witness and was also on the staff of the State’s Attorney does not render him legally incompetent, nor does it constitute an improper attempt to influence the grand jury. (People v. Strauch, 247 Ill. 220 , 93 N.E. 126 (1910).) While this practice could be subject to abuse and is not encouraged, we cannot say that any of defendant’s statutory or constitutional rights were offended.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.