Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Ind. 237

Cubberly v. Shearer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1863-05-15

<p>Practice. — When a cause is brought to this Court upon alleged errors in sustaining demurrers to the complaint, and the appellant’s counsel fails to point out the alleged errors, this Court will not search for them.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1864

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1863-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Action by the appellee against the appellants, upon a promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff.

¶2There is no error pointed out in the brief of counsel for the appellants. The defendants below filed an answer of several paragraphs, to which demurrers were sustained. The Counsel simply say, “the Court below erred in sustaining said / demurrers, for which the judgment ought to be reversed.” We shall not range through the record in search of the supposed errors. Vide Bray v. Carpenter, at the present term, [supra]

¶3The judgment below is affirmed, with costs, and 2 percent, damages.

/20/ind/237 · .json · Public domain