Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 I&NDEC 120 - DASS

DASS’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Zhang v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (2004), Yan Chen v. Gonzales (2005)

11 federal appellate ·

2501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Bolanos-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Carvajal-Munoz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sarvia-Quintanilla v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[m]ake an effort to support [their] statements by any available evidence and give a satisfactory explanation for any lack of evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.