EEASTERN AIRLINES

                                                             Interim Decision #3110




MATTER OF EASTERN AIRLINES, INC., FLIGHT #798
                               In Fine Proceedings
                                  MIA-10/12.3124
                    Decided by Board January 23, 1989

(1) In fine proceedings under section 273 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 

 (1982), liability cannot be avoided by proof that the alien passenger has
  lawful permanent resident status if he did not have proper entry documents in his
  possession at the time of his arrival.
(2)Fine liability cannot be avoided even if the alien was subsequently admitted as a
  returning lawful permanent resident alien where the alien did not have proper entry
  documents at the time of his arrival.
(3)Remission of a fine is not warranted where the carrier was correct in believing that
  the alien passenger had lawful permanent resident status if the alien did not have
  documents in his possession at the time of his arrival which entitled him to admission
  on the basis of such status.

In re: Eastern Airlines, Inc., Flight #798, which arrived at Miami, Florida, on
       December 9, 1985, from Jamaica. Alien passenger involved: Dora Carnegie.


BASIS FOR FINE: Act of 1952—Sec. 273(a) [8 U.S.C. § I323(a)j—Bringing to the
                            United States alien not in possession of unexpired
                            visa
ON BEHALF OF CARRIER: E.D. Perry, Manager
                                 System Facilitation
                                 Eastern Airlines, Inc.
                                 Miami International Airport
                                 Miami, Florida 33148

BY: Morris, Acting Chairman; Vacca, Board Member, Williams, Temporary Board
    Member


   In a decision dated May 20, 1986, the district director imposed an
administrative fine in the amount of $1,000 on Eastern Airlines, Inc.,
("the carrier") for violating section 273(a) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act, 

(a) (1982). The district director has
certified his decision to this Board pursuant to the provisions of 8
                                           57
Interim Decision #

(c) (1988). The decision of the district director will be
affirmed.
   The carrier brought the above-named alien passenger to the United
States from. Jamaica on December 9, 1985. Although the alien
passenger was a lawful permanent resident of the United States, she
did not have an Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-151) or a
reentry permit in her possession when she was presented for inspection. See generally 

 (1988). Consequently, the district
director issued a Notice of Intention to Fine (Form I-79) on December
20, 1985, in which he alleged that the carrier was liable for a $1,000
fine under section 273 of the Act for bringing an alien to the United
States from Jamaica without an unexpired visa or a reentry permit.
The carrier did not respond to the Notice of Intention to Fine.
   Apparently the district director had reservations about imposing a
fine in view of the fact that the alien passenger had lawful permanent
resident status. In any event, the district director certified his decision
to this Board for review on May 20, 1986. On July 7, 1986, the district
director received a later from the carrier in which the carrier
contended that a $1,000 fine was excessive and unjustified in the
circumstances of this case. The district director forwarded this letter to
the Board.
   The carrier has not been able to determine what occurred when the
alien passenger was boarded at Jamaica. The carrier alleges, however,
that its general procedures for such situations were followed. According to the carrier, when an alien without proper documents claims to
be a lawful permanent resident of the United States, reasonable
diligence is exercised to ascertain whether the alien has such status. If
the carrier is satisfied that the claim is true, the alien is then taken to
the United States.
   We agree with the district director's decision. For fine purposes
under section 273 of the Act, it does not matter whether an alien
passenger actually has lawful permanent resident status. The dispositive factor is whether the alien has proper entry documents in his
possession at the time of his arrival. See Matter of M/V "Emma," 

 (BIA 1981). Moreover, fine liability cannot be avoided
on the basis of the fact that the alien passenger was eventually
admitted to the United States as a returning lawful permanent
resident. See Matter of M/V "Runaway," 18 MEN Dec. 127 (BIA 1981).
We are satisfied, therefore, that fine liability has been established
under section 273 of the Act in this case for bringing an alien passenger
to the United States who did not have proper entry documents in her
possession at the time of her arrival.
   The next issue is whether remission is warranted under the
provisions of section 273(c) of the Act in the circumstances of this
                                    58
                                                Interim Decision #3110

case. Section 273(c) of the Act permits remission (forgiveness in full)
in one situation only: where it appears that prior to the alien's
departure from the last port outside the United States, the carrier did
not know, and could not have ascertained by the exercise of reasonable
diligence, that the individual transported was an alien and that a visa
was required. Matter of M/V "Emma," supra.
   The carrier apparently made an effort to ascertain whether the alien
passenger was a lawful permanent resident of the United States. The
carrier, however, knew, or should have known, that the alien passenger
did not have documents in her possession that would entitle her to
enter the United States on the basis of such status. We conclude,
therefore, that remission of the $1,000 fine is not warranted under
section 273(c) of the Act.
   Accordingly, the following order will be entered.
   ORDER:         The decision of the district director is affirmed.




                                  59