20 Johns. 475
Decided January 15, 1823
New York Supreme Court · decided 1823-01-15
WEJYDELL moved for an attachment for the non-payment of costs, against Selden and Post, to whom Norton, the plaintiff, had assigned a demand against Rich, for which a suit 111 , _ . had been brought in the name or J\. against R. and on a report of referees, a judgment was given in favour of R. against N. for 35 dollars.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1823-01-15
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1907
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1That is a remedy which the party may have pending the suit; but he is, also, entitled to an attachment, after a judgment in his favour. The motion must be granted.
¶2Mitchell objected, that items had been taxed in the bill for costs, on making a motion to change the venue in the
¶3CBtiSG*
¶4Although costs are not given on a motion *476to change the venue in a cause, yet they abide the event, an(j the party may have them taxed, when final judgment is signed.
¶5Motion granted.