Hanlin v. Baxter’s Empirical Analysis
1878
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1946
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hubler v. Pullen · Tayon v. Ladew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Can a justice, under any circumstances, permit such an amendment? It may be remarked that, as no change was made in the allegation of the date of the trespass, or the premises upon which the trespass was committed, the cause of action was apparently the same; and the only change -was that a different party was presented as entitled to recover for the damages done. It may be conceded that the circumstances are rare which will justify such an amendment; but that the power to make it exists must, we think, also be conceded. The authorities seem to warrant this””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rader v. Gvozdanovic““Our own statute of amendments in terms authorizes the ‘adding or striking out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect’.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dierks v. Walsh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.