Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 KANAPP2D 704 - Swartz v. Swartz

Swartz v. Swartz’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Todd v. Kelly · Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. Knutson · Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc. · Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc. · Gilger v. Lee Construction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “60-515. Persons under legal disability. (a) Effect. [I]f any person entitled to bring an action, ... at the time the cause of action accrued or at any time during the period the statute of limitations is running, is less than 18 years of age, ... such person shall be entitled to bring such action within one year after the person’s legal disability is removed, except that no such action shall be commenced by or on behalf of any person under the disability more than eight years after the time of the act giving rise to the cause of action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘The legislature has the power to revive actions barred by a statute of limitations if it specifically expresses its intent to do so through retroactive application of a new law. The legislature cannot revive a cause of action barred by a statute of repose, as such action would constitute the taking of property without due process.’ ” (Emphasis added.) 20 Kan. App. 2d at 708 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““(a) No action for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual abuse shall be commenced more than three years after the date the person attains 18 years of age or more than three years from the date the person discovers or reasonably should have discovered that the injury or illness was caused by childhood sexual abuse, whichever occurs later. “(b) As used in this section: (1) ‘Injury or illness’ includes psychological injury or illness, whether or not accompanied by physical injury or illness. (2) ‘Childhood sexual abuse’ includes any act committed against the person which act occurred when the person was under the age of 18 years and which act would have been a violation of any of the following: (A) Indecent liberties with a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3503 and amendments thereto; (B) aggravated indecent liberties .with a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3504 and amendments thereto; (C) aggravated criminal sodomy as defined in K.S.A. 21-3506 and amendments thereto; (D) enticement of a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3509 and amendments thereto; (E) indecent solicitation of a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3510 and amendments thereto; (F) aggravated indecent solicitation of a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3511 and amendments thereto; (G) sexual exploitation of a child as defined in K.S.A. 21-3516 and amendments thereto; or (H) aggravated incest as defined in K.S.A. 21-3603 and amendments thereto; or any prior laws of this state of similar effect at the time the ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.