State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · 54 Cal. 3d 1013 - People v. Walker · State v. Wills · United States v. Valencia · State v. Dubish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court could have imposed consecutive sentences for the two crimes but granted probation for both, so that McDaniel would be required to serve consecutive sentences if she violated probation. K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 21-4608(d) requires only that the sentences be consecutive; it does not forbid probation. Probation is granted after imposition of sentence. [Citations omitted.] Probation is not inherently inconsistent with consecutive sentences.” 20 Kan. App. 2d at 885 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torkelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.