Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 KANAPP2D 971 - State v. Mares

State v. Mares’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Starks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[W]henever a defendant is sentenced to a presumptive sentence and there is no claim of error in regard to crime severity level or criminal history, there is a strong legislative presumption that the sentence is not the result of partiality, prejudice, oppression, or-corrupt motive. Defendant has failed to come forward with any evidence which would overcome that statutory presumption.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.