Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 La. 397

State v. Young

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1868

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1868-06-15

<p>A p8nal bond conditioned that tbe accused will appear before the First District Court of New Orleans, when called upon, cannot beforfeited, and the seourifcie» made liable thereon by a decree of tbe District Court of tbo parish of Jefferson.</p>

Decided 1868-06-15

Taliaferro. J.

¶1Upon information laid against them in the First District Court of New Orleans, the defendants severally entered into recognizances, to answer before that court a charge of assault and battery preferred against them. The Court afterwards, perceiving that the offence charged was committed in the parish of Jefferson, transferred the proceedings to the District Court of that parish. The accused parties, failing to appear in that court, the district attorney of that district caused them and their sureties to be called on their recognizances, and took judgments on the several bonds as forfeited. From one of these judgments, the one rendered against the defendant, Green, and E. H. Summers, his surety in solido, for the sum of five hundred dollars, Summers, the surety, has appealed.

¶2The defence is, that no forfeiture of the bond has arisen; that the condition of the bond was for the appearance of the accused before tbe First District Court of New Orleans, and not for his appearance before the District Court of the parish of Jefferson.

¶3The defence must prevail.

¶4It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be annulled, avoided and reversed. It is further ordered, that judgment be rendered in favor of the defendant.

/20/la/397 · .json · Public domain