Ramsay v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1974
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reiser v. Abramson · Vogelsang v. Sehlhorst · Legum v. Hough · Norris v. Wolfensberger · Ghiradello v. Malina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Roadway means that portion of a highway improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel, exclusive of the berm or shoulder. If a highway includes two or more separate roadways the term ‘roadway’ as used herein refers to any such roadway separately but not to all such roadways collectively.” (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peters v. Ramsay““(a) The driver of a vehicle intending to turn to the left within an intersection or into an alley, private road, or driveway shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction which is within the intersection or so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peters v. Ramsay““Highway means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way or thoroughfare of any kind used by the public for purposes of vehicular travel, whether actually dedicated to the public and accepted by the proper authorities or otherwise.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peters v. Ramsay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.