Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Mo. 493

Ex parte Mallinkrodt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1855

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1855-03-15

Habeas Corpus. From the jailor’s return to a wfit issued by this court, it appeared that the petitioner was in custody under a mittimus issued by a notary public of St. Louis county, for an alleged contempt in not producing certain books and papers in obedience to a subpoena duces tecum issued by the notary, before whom he had been summoned to give his deposition as a witness on behalf of the plaintiffs in a certain cause pending in the St. Louis Circuit Court.

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““The power of notaries, in taking depositions, is strictly statutory. They can do nothing not expressly authorized and under the circumstances which authorize it. There is no power given to an officer taking depositions to commit a witness for refusing to produce books.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including In re Butler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1962

12 state decisions

40185518601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Scott, Judge.

¶1The act of 18th February, 1847, empowered notaries to take depositions under the act concerning “ Depositions, ” approved January 17, 1845. The fifteenth section of the act referred to authorized the officer empowered to take depositions, to compel the attendance of witnesses, in the same manner and under the like penalties as any court of record of this state.

¶2The eighth section of the act concerning witnesses provides *494that any person summoned as a witness and attending, who shall refuse to give evidence, which may lawfully be required to he given by such person, may be committed to prison by the person authorized to take his deposition.

¶3The power of notaries, in taking depositions, is strictly statutory. They can do nothing not expressly authorized and under the circumstances which authorize it. There is no power given to an officer taking depositions to commit a witness for refusing to produce books. Powers in derogation of the liberty of the citizen must be strictly construed.

¶4Let the prisoner be discharged, the other judges concurring.

/20/mo/493 · .json · Public domain